sermons
 
In Re: G-O-D
(Written two days after the Iraqi war began)

Sermon by: Susan Sparks
March 21, 2003


All rise…[congregation stands] This honorable Trademark court is now in session. All those who have business before this court gather nigh and be heard. I now call Docket No. 1A-4-6, regarding trademark violations of the name: "G-O-D." Counsel for the plaintiff may approach. You may be seated.

     [Sermon is structured as a final jury argument]

     May it please the court. I represent the owner of the protected and trademarked name "God", known in many other variations as Yahweh, Allah, Jesus, et. al. This suit was filed as a result of deliberate and unauthorized use of the aforesaid trademarked name of G-O-D (hereinafter referred to as "God".) In support of this complaint, we offer the following evidence:

     1. Throughout history, humanity has invoked the name of "God" to justify every imaginable violence--rape, murder, the pillaging of land, slavery, genocide and war.

     2. Such acts have been perpetrated by Kings and Queens, popes and generals, religious leaders and common folk alike-acts which have resulted in destruction, suffering and the loss of millions lives.

     3. Invoking the name of God has been most popular in the realm of war. Consider everything from the thirty years war to the crusades to the Third Reich. Most recently we see the world at war again…with the same unauthorized use of the name God, as in the centuries and centuries before. The United States and Iraq have both invoked the name of God to justify their positions as divinely sanctioned. On the one hand, we have Saddam Hussein, has claimed that "God" or "Allah" is on the side of his followers, saying, "Allah is their protector," and that "Iraq has triumphed over the enemies of the nation…with the help of Allah…" On the other hand, George Bush, has also claimed God's stamp of approval on the side of the US by designating the Iraqi government along with others the "axis of evil". He went on to clarify his position by stating that "Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty have always been at war. And we know that God is not neutral between them." Probably the most blatant of all offenders is ironically the Attorney General of the US who recently was quoted as saying, "We are a nation called to defend freedom-a freedom that is not the grant of any government or document, but our own endowment from God.".

     4. This confusing crossfire has damaged my client's reputation. It has caused wide spread confusion in God's position on war, on basic religious tenants as evidenced by a recent publication describing the Iraqi war as a "Jihad for Jesus."

     The damage is probably best illustrated by Maureen Dowd of the Washington Post (April 7, 2002), who said, "Dear God, save us from the people who believe in you."

     Not one of these parties had the expressed written or verbal authorization from my client. And there is no clear record of any select divine blessings being bestowed. As an aside, I might offer, especially for our American contingent, the First amendment of the US Constitution regarding separation of church and state.

     Let us be clear here. This lawsuit does not attempt to litigate the validity of war. Given that we have troops and civilians dying in the field as we speak, arguments about whether or not we should be there are moot. This suit simply demands that God's unauthorized stamp of approval, placed on everything from elections to war, cease and desist. In short, we must STOP blaming God for the inhumanity of humanity.

     In support of this argument I offer two points: First, we, as human beings, are capable of an almost unimaginable spectrum of behavior-on one hand the ability to love unconditionally and on the other, the ability to utterly destroy. And we choose which power to wield. Maybe you have seen it emerge through battle in your own life. Oh yes, life is full of battlefields…at work, in families, in love… Doesn't matter whether you are on the front line of a battlefield, or the front lines of a peace march… We have all lowered the crosshairs and pulled the trigger at some point in our lives.

     Second, as human beings we were all given free will. How we exercise it, is up to us. True, God has given some guidance. But frankly, I will admit to this court, that that is the weakest link in our case. We freely admit that the scripture's instruction regarding war are confusing at best. We have everything from "love your neighbor" and "blessed are the peace makers" to "an eye for an eye" and Romans language "the servant of God shall execute wrath on the wrong-doer." But, where does "love thy neighbor" end and "an eye for an eye" begin? Does love thy neighbor ever end? As a footnote, I offer Dr. Martin Luther King's thoughts here--for he warned us that "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth simply leaves us all blind and toothless."

     Others of God's creation have managed to find a healthy balance in these teachings…or perhaps I should say others of God's creation without an ego. Need we ask what would a grove of 2500 year-old redwood trees say about war? They've watched thousands of wars be raged, for every imaginable reason, and the people and the reasons justifying each have been long forgotten. How about in the animal kingdom? A lion, for example, will not attack, unless you threaten its food or its young. In light of this, it is interesting to ponder a war that some have argued has its roots in "oil" …but that is outside the scope of this lawsuit.

     I am sorry to say, war is alive and well in the 21st century. But, the God cannot be blamed for it. If we as human beings choose war, then so be it. No, we may not have signed the order for war, but let's put responsibility where responsibility lies…if we need to blame someone, blame the system, blame the government, blame the leaders, blame ourselves for electing the leaders… But leave God out of it.

     It is a slippery slope for if God's name is allowed to be invoked for war, then God gets blamed for war, and the next the you know God is then being held responsible for famine, disease, suffering, evil…etc etc. Worst of all, people then begin to point to tragedy and suffering and war as some type of divine judgment.

      War is not about God. War is not of God. For God stands on both sides of the battlefield…in the midst of the suffering, in the midst of the pain. So be clear about one thing: when the words stop and the bombs begin, notwithstanding any of our differences, we all weep in the same language… And God weeps with us. "For as Jesus came near and saw the city, he wept, saying 'If you had only recognized on this day the things that make for peace.'" I rest my case…


 

home   |   back   |   know   |   be   | feel  |  do